Written by Eleanor M. Lackman and Bryse K. Thornwell In Cosmic Crusaders LLC v. Andrusiek, No. 23-1150 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2023), a case involving comic book characters and trademark rights, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explored the application of the “prior use” element of a trademark likelihood of confusion claim under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act. The court placed … Continue reading Analogous Use Saves the Day for Comic Book Character Trademark
Written by Ian Logan On September 25, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion and order in JTH Tax LLC v. AMC Networks Inc., et al., Case No. 22-cv-06526, ECF No. 44 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2023), granting Defendants AMC Networks Inc. (“AMC”) and Sony Pictures Television Inc.’s (“Sony”) motion to dismiss. Applying the test originally set forth … Continue reading Better Call Saul Receives ‘Sweet Liberty’ From Trademark Suit
Written by Robert H. Rotstein and Eleanor M. Lackman On September 25, 2023, Judge Stephanos Bibas of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation in the District of Delaware, issued an opinion addressing the potential liability of an artificial intelligence startup for training its program using a copyrighted database. Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre Gmbh, et al. v. Ross Intelligence Inc., … Continue reading Of Artificial Intelligence and Untidy Facts: Federal District Court Denies Summary Judgment in AI Copyright Case
Written by Eleanor M. Lackman In Hunley v. Instagram, LLC, — F.4th — (July 17, 2023), the Ninth Circuit thwarted another attempt to outlaw embedding (also called “in-line linking”) of photographs. The court affirmed a district court’s ruling that parties who embedded on their websites photographs from Instagram did not violate the plaintiff photographers’ display right as set forth in 17 U.S.C. §106(5), and accordingly … Continue reading Is Embedding Photos on a Website Copyright Infringement? Ninth Circuit Says No.
Written by Marissa B. Lewis and Brandon E. Hughes On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Abitron Austria GmbH, et al. v. Hetronic International, Inc., No. 21-1043, holding that federal trademark law extends only to claims where the alleged infringing “use in commerce” occurs in the U.S. The ruling overturns a $96 million in damages awarded for infringing conduct that … Continue reading SCOTUS Holds That Federal Trademark Law Does Not Reach Infringing Conduct That Occurs Abroad
Written by Bryse K. Thornwell In Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ripps, et al, No. 2:22-CV-04355 (C. D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2023), Judge John F. Walter explored the use of trademarks in the world of non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”), which are tokenized assets that have been recorded on a blockchain. As intellectual property disputes continue to arise in the world of NFTs, the key issues that the … Continue reading Are Virtual Goods Still Goods for Trademark Purposes?
Written by Tiana A. Bey In Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, No. 20-CV-4160 (JGK), 2023 WL 2623787 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2023), Judge John G. Koeltl ruled that the “digital lending library” operated by Defendant Internet Archive (“IA”) infringed copyrights owned by the Plaintiffs in books that IA had reproduced and distributed to the public on the theory that it could run an “emergency … Continue reading Fair Use of “Foul Play”? SDNY Judge Says No!
Written by Alesha M. Dominique and Lindsay R. Edelstein The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) tribal insignia trademark program allows Native American tribes to include tribal insignias in the USPTO’s database at no charge. The USPTO’s waiver of application fees is intended to foster adequate protections for Native American tribes’ intellectual property and cultural heritage. The tribal insignia database has been a component of … Continue reading No “Fees or Forms” Required for Inclusion of Native American Tribal Insignias in USPTO Database
On February 15, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) new rules will go into effect (84 Fed. Reg. 37081) requiring applicants, registrants, and parties to a proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to provide their own email address to receive USPTO correspondence, and file all trademark submissions electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), with limited exceptions. In addition, the new rule amends the requirements for specimens in accordance with the Trademark Act and precedential case law.
Requirement to Provide Applicant, Registrant and Party Email Address
As of February 15, 2020, applicants, registrants, and parties to a proceeding before the TTAB, will be required to provide and maintain their own valid email address for receipt of correspondence from the USPTO. This requirement is in addition to the attorney address that is already required. The applicant’s, registrant’s, or party’s email address will be publicly displayed along with other contact information already available in the USPTO’s public database. Continue reading “New USPTO Guidelines for Electronic Filings and Specimens”
MSK Blog 