Category: Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property

Court Rules “Video Game Addiction” Claims Are Barred By the First Amendment and Section 230

Written by Brandon Hughes A recent motion to dismiss order out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois is one of the first opinions substantively addressing tort claims based on alleged video game addiction. The decision in Angelilli v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., et al., No. 23-CV-16566, 2025 WL 1181000 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 23, 2025), could in the future influence other … Continue reading Court Rules “Video Game Addiction” Claims Are Barred By the First Amendment and Section 230

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
artificial intelligence, Intellectual Property, Specialties

No Entrance to Legal Paradise: D.C. Court of Appeals Affirms Denial of Copyright Registration for AI-Generated Artwork

Written by Brandon E. Hughes In Thaler v. Perlmutter, No. 23-5233, 2025 WL 839178 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 18, 2025), the latest opinion exploring the intersection between generative AI and copyright law, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit tackled a fundamental question: “Can a non-human machine be an author under the Copyright Act of 1976?” Ultimately, the Court affirmed the … Continue reading No Entrance to Legal Paradise: D.C. Court of Appeals Affirms Denial of Copyright Registration for AI-Generated Artwork

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Drawing the Line in Between Separate Corporations: Supreme Court Vacates a $43M Trademark Disgorgement Ruling

Written by Franklin F. Franco On February 26, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Dewberry Group Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. that reaffirms a key limitation in trademark remedies: courts cannot order disgorgement of profits from a defendant’s corporate affiliates unless those entities are expressly named as defendants. In a unanimous ruling, the Court held that the Lanham Act’s provision for … Continue reading Drawing the Line in Between Separate Corporations: Supreme Court Vacates a $43M Trademark Disgorgement Ruling

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Court Unplugs AI Fair Use Defense, But Context Is Key

Written by Mark Humphrey Yesterday, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware became the first court in the United States to issue a substantive decision on whether using copyrighted material to “train” an artificial intelligence (AI) tool is protected by the fair use doctrine, finding that fair use did not apply under a rather unique set of facts. Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre … Continue reading Court Unplugs AI Fair Use Defense, But Context Is Key

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Watered Down Whisky: Bad Spaniels Dilutes Trademarks But Does Not Infringe

Written by Ian Logan After more than a decade of litigation, which included U.S. Supreme Court review, VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc., No. CV-14-02057 returned to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona for yet another ruling on remand.  On January 21, 2025, U.S. District Judge Stephen M. McNamee ruled that although the “Bad Spaniels” dog toy, shaped like … Continue reading Watered Down Whisky: Bad Spaniels Dilutes Trademarks But Does Not Infringe

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

U.S. Trademark Office Fees Increasing Significantly on January 18, 2025: What It Means for You

Written by Eleanor M. Lackman The new year is bringing with it some major fee increases from the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) for certain key aspects for trademark filings and other trademark prosecution. Nearly all go into effect on January 18, 2025. Here are some major changes to know, and how they may affect your filing strategy in the United States: These changes … Continue reading U.S. Trademark Office Fees Increasing Significantly on January 18, 2025: What It Means for You

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

“Conquesting” Lawsuit Is No Conquest for Trademark Plaintiff

Written by Skyler M. Terrebonne On October 22, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court delivered the latest word on whether the practice of “keyword advertising,” and in particular the strategy of “conquesting,” constitutes trademark infringement. Keyword advertising is an advertising strategy wherein a company bids on a Google Ads keyword, so that an advertisement for its business will appear near the top … Continue reading “Conquesting” Lawsuit Is No Conquest for Trademark Plaintiff

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Not Just Your Neighborhood Library: Second Circuit Rejects Argument that Internet Archive’s E-book Database Is Fair Use

Written by Robert Rotstein On September 4, 2024, in Hachette Book Group, Inc., et al. v. Internet Archive, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a ruling that a defendant that has created a massive database of copyrighted print books and allows users to access the books for free cannot rely on the copyright law’s fair use defense, 17 U.S.C. §107, to … Continue reading Not Just Your Neighborhood Library: Second Circuit Rejects Argument that Internet Archive’s E-book Database Is Fair Use

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press: A Trademark Defendant Prevails Post-Jack Daniel’s

Written by Constance Kang Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press is one of the first rulings to grapple with an infringement case following the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent limitation of the applicability of a First Amendment-based defense in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products LLC.  The opinion, issued in the case last week upon remand after the Ninth Circuit’s reading of Jack Daniel’s, not only held … Continue reading Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press: A Trademark Defendant Prevails Post-Jack Daniel’s

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Eight Mile Style v. Spotify: District Court Holds Doctrine of Equitable Estoppel Bars Copyright Claims

Written by Robert H. Rotstein On August 15, 2024, a federal district court granted summary judgment to defendants Spotify USA Inc. (“Spotify”) and the Harry Fox Agency (“HFA”) in their long-running copyright-infringement dispute with plaintiffs Eight Mile Style and Martin Affiliated, LLC (together, “Eight Mile Style”) over the service’s streaming of Eminem’s catalog. Eight Mile Style, LLC  v. Spotify USA Inc., 3:19-CV-00736, 2024 WL 3836075 … Continue reading Eight Mile Style v. Spotify: District Court Holds Doctrine of Equitable Estoppel Bars Copyright Claims

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment