Category: Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property

Court Unplugs AI Fair Use Defense, But Context Is Key

Written by Mark Humphrey Yesterday, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware became the first court in the United States to issue a substantive decision on whether using copyrighted material to “train” an artificial intelligence (AI) tool is protected by the fair use doctrine, finding that fair use did not apply under a rather unique set of facts. Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre … Continue reading Court Unplugs AI Fair Use Defense, But Context Is Key

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Watered Down Whisky: Bad Spaniels Dilutes Trademarks But Does Not Infringe

Written by Ian Logan After more than a decade of litigation, which included U.S. Supreme Court review, VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc., No. CV-14-02057 returned to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona for yet another ruling on remand.  On January 21, 2025, U.S. District Judge Stephen M. McNamee ruled that although the “Bad Spaniels” dog toy, shaped like … Continue reading Watered Down Whisky: Bad Spaniels Dilutes Trademarks But Does Not Infringe

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

U.S. Trademark Office Fees Increasing Significantly on January 18, 2025: What It Means for You

Written by Eleanor M. Lackman The new year is bringing with it some major fee increases from the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) for certain key aspects for trademark filings and other trademark prosecution. Nearly all go into effect on January 18, 2025. Here are some major changes to know, and how they may affect your filing strategy in the United States: These changes … Continue reading U.S. Trademark Office Fees Increasing Significantly on January 18, 2025: What It Means for You

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

“Conquesting” Lawsuit Is No Conquest for Trademark Plaintiff

Written by Skyler M. Terrebonne On October 22, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court delivered the latest word on whether the practice of “keyword advertising,” and in particular the strategy of “conquesting,” constitutes trademark infringement. Keyword advertising is an advertising strategy wherein a company bids on a Google Ads keyword, so that an advertisement for its business will appear near the top … Continue reading “Conquesting” Lawsuit Is No Conquest for Trademark Plaintiff

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Not Just Your Neighborhood Library: Second Circuit Rejects Argument that Internet Archive’s E-book Database Is Fair Use

Written by Robert Rotstein On September 4, 2024, in Hachette Book Group, Inc., et al. v. Internet Archive, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a ruling that a defendant that has created a massive database of copyrighted print books and allows users to access the books for free cannot rely on the copyright law’s fair use defense, 17 U.S.C. §107, to … Continue reading Not Just Your Neighborhood Library: Second Circuit Rejects Argument that Internet Archive’s E-book Database Is Fair Use

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press: A Trademark Defendant Prevails Post-Jack Daniel’s

Written by Constance Kang Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press is one of the first rulings to grapple with an infringement case following the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent limitation of the applicability of a First Amendment-based defense in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products LLC.  The opinion, issued in the case last week upon remand after the Ninth Circuit’s reading of Jack Daniel’s, not only held … Continue reading Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press: A Trademark Defendant Prevails Post-Jack Daniel’s

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Eight Mile Style v. Spotify: District Court Holds Doctrine of Equitable Estoppel Bars Copyright Claims

Written by Robert H. Rotstein On August 15, 2024, a federal district court granted summary judgment to defendants Spotify USA Inc. (“Spotify”) and the Harry Fox Agency (“HFA”) in their long-running copyright-infringement dispute with plaintiffs Eight Mile Style and Martin Affiliated, LLC (together, “Eight Mile Style”) over the service’s streaming of Eminem’s catalog. Eight Mile Style, LLC  v. Spotify USA Inc., 3:19-CV-00736, 2024 WL 3836075 … Continue reading Eight Mile Style v. Spotify: District Court Holds Doctrine of Equitable Estoppel Bars Copyright Claims

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Vetter v. Resnik: A Copyright Termination Opinion that Knows No Boundaries

Written by Eric J. Schwartz and Rebecca Benyamin For the first time, a federal court has held that termination rights under Section 304 of the Copyright Act of 1976 (17 U.S.C. § 304) re-capture not only U.S. copyright rights, but also foreign rights as well, where the original grant of rights was for “worldwide” rights. Vetter v. Resnik, No. 23-1369-SDD-EWD, 2024 WL 3405556 (D. La. … Continue reading Vetter v. Resnik: A Copyright Termination Opinion that Knows No Boundaries

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Class Action Alleging Improper Appropriation of Individuals’ Likenesses Falls Within the Public Interest Exception to California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Written by Alexandra Anfuso In Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc., Case No. 23-15260, 2024 WL 3325663 (9th Cir,. July 8, 2024), the Ninth Circuit held that California’s anti-SLAPP provisions could not overcome a class action seeking to preclude the appropriation of individuals’ names and likenesses. Defendant Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (“D&B”) operates a searchable business-to-business database called D&B Hoovers, which contains information … Continue reading Class Action Alleging Improper Appropriation of Individuals’ Likenesses Falls Within the Public Interest Exception to California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Assuming, But Not Deciding, That a Discovery Rule Exists, SCOTUS Rejects Three-Year Limit on Copyright Damages

Written by Samantha W. Frankel On May 9, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy, No. 22-1078, 601 U.S. —-, 2024 WL 2061137 (U.S. May 9, 2024), resolving a circuit split over whether copyright law’s three-year statute of limitations bars a plaintiff from recovering all monetary damages suffered from inception even though the plaintiff discovered the … Continue reading Assuming, But Not Deciding, That a Discovery Rule Exists, SCOTUS Rejects Three-Year Limit on Copyright Damages

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment