Author: mskllp

Since 1908, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP (MSK) has proven its ability to understand the complex, demystify the mysterious, and define the unknown. With more than 130 lawyers and offices in Los Angeles, New York, and Washington D.C., MSK is often distinguished as a “go-to” firm by industry and legal insiders, and has extensive experience in a variety of practice areas, including Entertainment & IP Litigation, Labor & Employment, Entertainment Transactions, Immigration, Corporate Securities, Regulatory, Tax, Trusts & Estates, Real Estate and International Trade. Relentlessly innovative, our lawyers have developed groundbreaking legislation, established influential precedents, and shaped the legal landscape. For more information, visit www.msk.com.
Intellectual Property

Not Just Your Neighborhood Library: Second Circuit Rejects Argument that Internet Archive’s E-book Database Is Fair Use

Written by Robert Rotstein On September 4, 2024, in Hachette Book Group, Inc., et al. v. Internet Archive, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a ruling that a defendant that has created a massive database of copyrighted print books and allows users to access the books for free cannot rely on the copyright law’s fair use defense, 17 U.S.C. §107, to … Continue reading Not Just Your Neighborhood Library: Second Circuit Rejects Argument that Internet Archive’s E-book Database Is Fair Use

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press: A Trademark Defendant Prevails Post-Jack Daniel’s

Written by Constance Kang Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press is one of the first rulings to grapple with an infringement case following the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent limitation of the applicability of a First Amendment-based defense in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products LLC.  The opinion, issued in the case last week upon remand after the Ninth Circuit’s reading of Jack Daniel’s, not only held … Continue reading Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press: A Trademark Defendant Prevails Post-Jack Daniel’s

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Eight Mile Style v. Spotify: District Court Holds Doctrine of Equitable Estoppel Bars Copyright Claims

Written by Robert H. Rotstein On August 15, 2024, a federal district court granted summary judgment to defendants Spotify USA Inc. (“Spotify”) and the Harry Fox Agency (“HFA”) in their long-running copyright-infringement dispute with plaintiffs Eight Mile Style and Martin Affiliated, LLC (together, “Eight Mile Style”) over the service’s streaming of Eminem’s catalog. Eight Mile Style, LLC  v. Spotify USA Inc., 3:19-CV-00736, 2024 WL 3836075 … Continue reading Eight Mile Style v. Spotify: District Court Holds Doctrine of Equitable Estoppel Bars Copyright Claims

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Labor & Employment

New Considerations for Employers Committed to DEI Initiatives

Written by Louise Truong and Ricky Tai The current state of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives is at a critical juncture. Recent court decisions and policy changes have presented significant challenges to ongoing DEI efforts across industries and sectors.  How to implement DEI initiatives moving forward in this new landscape will require a thoughtful approach.  In recent years, there has been an uptick in … Continue reading New Considerations for Employers Committed to DEI Initiatives

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Cybersecurity, Regulatory

VPPA Litigation Trends and Defense Strategies

Written by Susan Kohn Ross, Lucy Plovnick, and Stacey Chuvaieva Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) litigation has become a major focus for class action lawyers targeting websites using Meta or Google Pixels that offer any kind of subscription for users and contain video content. Despite the recent litigation trend primarily favoring defendants, VPPA litigation remains persistent, and the steady flow of cases shows no signs … Continue reading VPPA Litigation Trends and Defense Strategies

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Vetter v. Resnik: A Copyright Termination Opinion that Knows No Boundaries

Written by Eric J. Schwartz and Rebecca Benyamin For the first time, a federal court has held that termination rights under Section 304 of the Copyright Act of 1976 (17 U.S.C. § 304) re-capture not only U.S. copyright rights, but also foreign rights as well, where the original grant of rights was for “worldwide” rights. Vetter v. Resnik, No. 23-1369-SDD-EWD, 2024 WL 3405556 (D. La. … Continue reading Vetter v. Resnik: A Copyright Termination Opinion that Knows No Boundaries

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Labor & Employment

SCOTUS’s Curbing of Federal Agency Actions – A Tool to Place Guardrails on the NLRB’s Recent Policies to Expand its Reach under the NLRA

Written by Jonathan Turner and Eric Engelman On June 27 and 28, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two separate opinions that have placed judicial restraints on the scope of powers exercised by federal agencies to interpret and enforce statutes they are charged to administer.  In its opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Court ended four decades of deference to … Continue reading SCOTUS’s Curbing of Federal Agency Actions – A Tool to Place Guardrails on the NLRB’s Recent Policies to Expand its Reach under the NLRA

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Labor & Employment

FTC’s Non-Compete Ban Faces Challenge in Texas Lawsuit As Enforcement is Put On Hold

Written by Jeremy Mittman Earlier this month, a federal judge in Texas issued a preliminary order against the Federal Trade Commission’s ban on non-compete agreements. Judge Ada Brown ruled in favor of Ryan LLC, a tax-services firm operating out of Dallas which utilizes non-compete agreements with its employees. Ryan LLC argued that the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) was overstepping its legal authority by attempting to … Continue reading FTC’s Non-Compete Ban Faces Challenge in Texas Lawsuit As Enforcement is Put On Hold

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Intellectual Property

Class Action Alleging Improper Appropriation of Individuals’ Likenesses Falls Within the Public Interest Exception to California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Written by Alexandra Anfuso In Batis v. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc., Case No. 23-15260, 2024 WL 3325663 (9th Cir,. July 8, 2024), the Ninth Circuit held that California’s anti-SLAPP provisions could not overcome a class action seeking to preclude the appropriation of individuals’ names and likenesses. Defendant Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc. (“D&B”) operates a searchable business-to-business database called D&B Hoovers, which contains information … Continue reading Class Action Alleging Improper Appropriation of Individuals’ Likenesses Falls Within the Public Interest Exception to California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment
Labor & Employment

Supreme Court Ruling Limits NLRB’s Ability to Obtain Preliminary Injunctions Against Employers

Written by Jonathan Turner and Eric D. Engelman In a closely watched case, the Supreme Court ruled against the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or Board) and in favor of Starbucks on the question of what the NLRB must prove before it can obtain a preliminary injunction against employers prior to fully litigating allegations contained in an unfair labor practice complaint issued by the NLRB.  … Continue reading Supreme Court Ruling Limits NLRB’s Ability to Obtain Preliminary Injunctions Against Employers

Unknown's avatarmskllpLeave a comment